![]() The only difference is that someone promises not to talk about something. The problem here is the NDA which is what we called a CYA (Cover Your Ass) document when I worked for lawyers. What makes me go hmmmmm…is, “We now know victims should not be silenced.” That is iRest’s contention? NOW know? But not in 2012? 2012 wasn’t that long ago in the grand scheme of things. Questions can be sent to the Institute and we will do our best to respond, as appropriate.“ We also wish to remain open and offer a safe space for healing for our entire community. We will continue to think deeply about any additional steps that need to be taken in our organization as we move forward. We now know victims should not be silenced. The understanding and handling of matters like this has – and will continue to – evolve. We recognize that we are being called forth to engage in further acknowledgment and healing.We hope to continue to re-establish communication with the individual voicing these allegations in a way that offers a renewed pathway for listening and understanding and facilitates healing and resolution. The former employee was notified of both the legal opinion and the Ethics Committee’s decision by the Institute’s lawyer via email. ![]() The Institute also took the issue to its independent Ethics Committee for review and the Committee determined that the validity of an existing NDA was a legal issue and out of the scope of the Ethics Committee but recommended the Institute review its process of employees signing NDAs when departing the organization. ![]() The Institute sought out legal advice and the NDA was found to remain a valid contract under California law. In 2020, the former employee reached out to the Institute questioning the legality of the NDA previously signed. Six months later, the former employee expressed their desire to terminate their employment, and as part of a departure package, an NDA was signed. At that point, a memorandum of understanding summarizing the events to date, and setting out appropriate workplace engagement in order to guide future interactions between the two was signed by both parties. Both parties came to a resolution that would allow them to work together again. The harassment complaint was investigated, found to be valid, and advanced to a process of independent mediation agreed upon by both Richard and the employee. The employee has requested we not detail the incident. While employed at iRest Institute in 2012, the individual now stating these allegations brought forward a complaint about Richard Miller. While it is not our intention to withhold information from the iRest community, we feel it is crucial to the process of restoration and healing to respect this request, and agree to provide only the degree of detail that maintains this respect. We equally wish to respect the privacy of those directly involved.In an effort to begin a new pathway for resolution, we reached out to the individual making the allegations and heard their request for the details and facts of the allegations to be excluded from any official iRest Institute statement. With trauma-sensitivity as a foundation of our mission and the iRest teachings, we recognize that secrecy creates a significant barrier to safety and healing and transparency is paramount. ![]() We know that our community is concerned to hear this and we wish to address these allegations with the utmost care, respect, sensitivity, and transparency. “ Richard Miller and iRest Institute have recently been the subject of allegations of sexual harassment and then oppression by the use of a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA). Below is iRest’s explanation about the incident and the NDA (Non-Disclosure Agreement): Are we still surprised/shocked/angered that this shit still happens? Once again a well known male yoga teacher has been accused of sexual harassment.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |